Why Was the Labour Party's Reign in 1924 so Short-Lived?

Topics: Soviet Union, Liberalism, Left-wing politics Pages: 3 (855 words) Published: May 9, 2002
The appointment of the first Labour government in January 1924 was widely regarded by contemporaries as an event of great political and social significance. The new Prime Minister, Ramsay MacDonald, lacked the governmental experience of his predecessors and had risen from obscure origins. Many on the political right expressed alarmist expectations of attacks on private property and established institutions. Among the more extreme predictions was a claim that women would be nationalised and free love proclaimed as official government policy. Winston Churchill wrote that ‘the enthronement in office of a Socialist government will be a serious national misfortune such as has usually befallen great States only on the morrow of defeat in war'.

Notwithstanding such apocalyptic pronouncements, the government's behaviour proved to be so moderate that its most radical supporters were to be gravely disappointed. After less than 10 months in office, no significant steps had been taken towards the achievement of socialist goals. The party suffered a heavy defeat in the general election of October 1924, winning 151 seats to the Conservatives' 419.

The performance of the first Labour government was to be affected to a large extent by the circumstances in which it took office. It is important to remember that it was a minority administration, which had come to power because of the peculiar outcome of the December 1923 general election. Although the Conservatives had remained the largest party in the Commons, they were outnumbered by the Liberals and Labour. Since the contest had turned on one issue, it could legitimately be argued that Labour, as the largest pro-free trade party, had the right to form a government. On the other hand, this would mean forming a ministry with the help of the Liberals, who could withdraw their support at any time.

In these circumstances Labour's term of office was unlikely to be more than a rather unsatisfactory apprenticeship in power. Some...
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Why Ww1 Was so Devastating Essay
  • Essay on How Important Was the First World War in the Growth of the Labour Party in the Period from 1918 to 1924.
  • It was the contrast between Douglas – Home and Wilson that led to the labour Party’s victory in 1964. Explain why you agree or disagree with...
  • Why Was There so Little Opposition to the Nazi Regime? Essay
  • Essay about Why was the Roman Army so Successful?
  • Why Was the Roman Arms so Successful Essay
  • Why was the Roman army so successful Essay
  • Why Was Opposition to the Nazis so Ineffective? Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free