To Discuss Whether the Classless Society Is Attainable and Sustainable in This Century

Topics: Marxism, Karl Marx, Social class Pages: 5 (1574 words) Published: July 16, 2013
The aim of this assignment is to discuss whether the classless society is attainable and sustainable in this century. To begin the definition of concepts are given, then the origin of the classes. It then looks at how the capitalist society cannot evolve to the classless society in this century. According to Ernesto (2007:17), Classes are a large group of people who differ in their relation to the means of their role in the social economic and political organization. Their class stratus is determined by their position to the means of production. According to Ernesto (2007:17), the theory of Karl Marx depicts four stages that have societies evolved in the last centauries and from the last stage, the class struggles can hence bring the classless society. According to Friedrich (1944:25), one of his greatest debates was the issue regarding the freedom of mankind. The main determining factor for Karl Marx for a classless society and freedom is class conflict.   He also asserts that Karl Marx traced the history of mankind by the ways in which the economy operated and the role of classes within the economy. Because of this, the greatest factor in the classes was determining who owns this freedom. With this in mind, Karl Marx gives us a solution to both the issues of freedom and class conflict in his critique of capitalism and theory of communism, which is the ideal society for Marx. His theory of communism is based on the “ultimate end of human history” because there will be freedom for all humankind.   Ernesto (2007:18) asserts that the conflict theory looks at how certain social interactions occur through conflict. People engage in conflict everyday to gain more power than others in society. Karl Marx is known for studying the conflicts that occur between different classes. Karl Marx has introduced some radical ideas and theories to society through his writings. As the industrial revolution moved forward in society, so did the widening gap between class structures. Karl Marx studied the differences arising between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat people. According to Bellamy (2003:49), the bourgeoisies are interested mainly in developing a capitalist society, using advanced methods of production. The bourgeoisies are the capitalist who own the factories; the products made in the factories, and controlled all the trade. The Proletariats or working class people have gained nothing in society but the thrill of their own labor. The Proletariats feel that they are treated poorly by the middle class society. They receive only enough in life to survive and have no chance of achieving a higher, class status. According to Harding (1984), the bourgeoisie or middle class people in society were exploiting and degrading the Proletariat people. The Proletariats helped to improve production in society, which developed capitalism and helped it to grow faster. The Proletariats were not getting the wages they deserved for the labor that was accomplished. Capital gain was being made for the labor the working class provided, but there was still no way of improving status in society. The middle class was taking over and the rich were staying rich and the poor continued to be poor. Marx wanted the working class to stand up to the bourgeoisie and cause a class conflict. The idea was that if the working class revolted against the capitalist, it would bring about the revolution that would usher the capitalist society into a classless society. According to Holmes (2009), Karl Marx saw communism as the ideal society which was also the classless society because it is the genuine resolution of the conflict between man and man; the true resolution of the strife between existence and essence, between freedom and necessity that capitalism fosters.   Holmes (2009) also alludes to how Karl Marx was also committed to the notion that theory and action go hand in hand.   He dismissed earlier philosophers or thinkers because they only interpreted the world in...

Bibliography: Ernesto S. (2007). Libertarian communism: Marx Engels and the Political Economy of Freedom, Palgrave Macmillan, London,.
Friedrich, H. (1944). The Road to Serfdom. University Of Chicago Press
Bellamy, R
Harding, N. (1984). The State in Socialist Society, second edition (1984) St. Antony 's College: Oxford, p. 189.
Holmes, L. (2009). Communism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. 
Dirlik, A. (1989).Origins of Chinese Communism
Theodore, L (2004). Communism: A Primary Source Analysis. London: The Rosen Publishing Group.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Essay about this is it
  • Karl Marx Classless Society Essay
  • Discuss Whether Whistle Blowing Has a Place in Society. Essay
  • Australia Isn't Classless Society Essay
  • Essay about Can We Speak of a 'Classless Society'
  • Discuss Whether Taxation Is The Most Research Paper
  • “Society Is an Arena for Inequality That Generates Conflict and Change.” Discuss This Statement Using Four Well Developed Examples from...
  • S New Zealand/Aotearoa a Classless Society? Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free